Meeting in Hilo on Friday (May 29, 2009), the University of Hawaii Board of Regents spent an extended time listening to, and exploring the feelings of, two citizens who got up to speak during the initial "Public Comment" portion of a crowded agenda.
(I attended because a new PBS Hawaii lease was up for consideration for the Manoa campus.)
I'm glad I had the opportunity to see and hear the exchanges, which took place in a rather intimate setting and which did not attract TV news cameras.
The testifiers, both earnest native-Hawaiian women, were outraged that the regents had narrowed their search for UH President to two candidates without local ties. One of the women said that it's unacceptable to send a malihini, unschooled in local culture and local politics, to the Legislature to secure funding for the severely cash-strapped public university. "We need money," she admonished regents. She also criticized having so little choice for such an important position. She pointed out that when a small community college here was seeking a new leader, five finalists were presented.
Regents Chair Al Landon said he wanted to listen as closely as possible and give as much information as regents responsibly could, because he knew the women were voicing concerns of a larger community as well.
For many who've expressed public opinions, the biggest emotion inspired by the finalists is dread. What if this is another expensive Dobelle-like dead-end?
What Chair Landon and fellow regents got across is this: the number of candidates was winnowed from many to 14 very qualified applicants, some with strong local ties. One candidate withdrew. Then the field was narrowed to three finalists, who were to visit campuses for getting-to-know-you sessions. At that point, another candidate pulled out, citing discomfort with a public hiring process.
The regents assured critics that the President selection panel has strong UH and Hawaii ties and absolutely understands the sentiment for a local connection. In the end, they said, the panel had to go with who would be the"best fit" for the UH. That trumped local creds. The regents said they're confident that both finalists have what it takes to be a true leader for the UH system.
The testifiers were impressed with the regents' willingness to listen and discuss, but they remained unsatisfied with the regents' Presidential search results.
Recent Comments